Assignment 1: Program Evaluation, Objectives and Setting Targets
You have been asked by your supervisor to review a community health program in your current healthcare setting. If you do not have a community program available at work, you may research and use for this assignment one that you find online.Specifically, you are to discuss the issue that the program addresses. Present and evaluate the current program objectives and targets. Your supervisor wants to know your assessment based on your current knowledge of developing program objectives and setting targets.Required key elements (be sure to review grading rubric for scoring!):
Develop a 2-page max WORD format paper that includes at minimum the following:
Cover/Title PageExecutive Summary (1-2 paragraphs)
Discuss the Situation. What issues does the program attempt to address?
Identify the program’s objectives and targets.
Present your Assessment of the program’s objectives and targets.Present your Recommendations for program improvementConclusionIn-text citations and references: APA styleWriting: standard edited American EnglishBe sure the following is evident in your paper Define the health problemIdentify or write the Casual Theory of the Health Problem Identify several of the program objectivesIdentify several of the program targetsAssessment of objectives and targets
Criteria
Scholarly
Writing: length,
spelling,
Grammar,
Mechanics/APA
formatting,
punctuation,
college level, use
of FIU writing
center
Max 40 Points
Ratings
P
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Demonstrates masterful
writing proficiency at the
academic level of the course
using standard edited
American English. Paper
reflects insight and careful
analysis. Ideas are
supported. Content is wellorganized. Writing style
aids and supports content
readability.
Demonstrates adequate
writing proficiency at the
academic level of the course
using standard edited
American English. Paper
reflects some insights and
analysis. Ideas are supported.
Content is well-organized.
Writing style mostly aids and
supports content readability.
Writing proficiency
occasionally is not at the
academic level of the course
using standard edited American
English. Paper lacks adequate
insights and analysis. Ideas
need more support.
Organization and style
sometimes impact content
readability.
Writing is not at the
academic level of the
course using standard
edited American English.
Paper lacks insights and
analysis. Ideas lack
support. Organization and
style frequently impact
content readability.
Evidence of USE OF THE
Evidence of USE OF THE FIU WRITING CENTER.
FIU WRITING CENTER. TurnItIn Software review
TurnItIn Software review
also required. MUST BE
also required. MUST BE
LESS THAN 25% to receive
LESS THAN 25% to
a grade
receive a grade.
35 to > 30 pts
40 to > 35 pts
Evidence of the following
might be missing:
FIU writing center, passing
TurnItIn software score.
Evidence of the following
might be missing:
FIU writing center,
passing TurnItIn
software score.
30 to > 20pts
20 to >0
4
Source citations,
quality of
references
Max 20 Points
Assignmentdriven criteria:
summary,
discussions,
assessment,
recommendation,
conclusion Max
20 Points
Exceptional sources;
appropriately cited; correct
# of sources (4 including
course text). Fully
integrated into paper with
commentary.
20 to > 18 pts
Credible sources;
Mostly credible sources;
appropriately cited. Correct # Citation issues or # issues
of sources.
16 to > 10pts
18 to > 16 pts
Lack of credible sources;
Citation issues or # issues.
Errors distract from
readability of paper.
10 to > 0 pts
2
Masterly presentation of all
content requirements,
including explanations, plus
a preponderance of insights
and analysis
20 to > 18 pts
Adequate presentation of all
content requirements,
including explanations,
insights and analysis
18 to > 16 pts
Somewhat Adequate
presentation of content
requirements. Some
components shallow or missing.
Some explanations, insights or
analysis shallow or missing 16
to > 10pts
Inadequate presentation of
content requirements.
Most components be
shallow or missing. Most
explanations, insights or
analysis shallow or
missing
10 to > 0 pts
2
Demonstrates occasional
mastery conceptualizing of
the problem. Shows some
analysis, synthesis, and
evaluation of required
material.
18 to > 16 pts
Demonstrates a lack of mastery
conceptualizing of the problem.
Shows little analysis, synthesis,
and evaluation of required
material. Presents simple
commentary and summary.
16 to > 10pts
Demonstrates little to no
conceptualizing of the
problem. Little to no
analysis, synthesis, and
evaluation of required
material. Presents mostly
summary.
10 to > 0 pts
2
Critical Thinking Demonstrates mastery
conceptualizing of the
Max 20 Points
problem. Shows a
preponderance of analysis,
synthesis, and evaluation
20 to > 18 pts
Total Points: 10

Purchase answer to see full
attachment